Facebook could easily “become” Twitter- if they wanted to.

tech news & insight — Tags: , , — ramseymohsen @ Monday, April 27th, 2009 - 1:55 am

I believe Facebook at the ‘flip of a switch’ can position itself to be a strong competitor to Twitter.

The power of a users’ status update on Facebook is strong — it’s not only been amplified in terms of prominence and attention on the website redesign, but more importantly it has socially been habitual by users to be updated frequently.

If you think about the fact that Twitter is now mainstream and people not entrenched into the tech industry (like my sister and my Starbucks barista) are now being introduced accepting this concept of real-time status updates wherever they go (a.k.a microblogging). Right now, this socialization or concept of receiving real-time updates is being facilitated by Twitter, it’s a “learning curve” for the masses (much like FB Newsfeed was when it was first introduced).

That said, I believe that if Facebook waits for Twitter to go through it’s life cycle of popularity — when ready they could activate the sending of status updates to Facebook users’ phones. Right now, users are required to complete the complex task of editing your ‘mobile’ settings and manually adding specifically whom you’d like to receive status updates directly to your phone.

Imagine if when you added a new friend you were prompted with “Would you like to receive mobile status updates from this person?” Or, what if, in the Newsfeed, next to users’ status updates, an icon appeared that instantly added them to your preferred mobile updates list when clicked?


technical rendering drawing done by Ramsey
:)

While I understand Twitter is much more robust in terms of how it can be used, I’m wondering if this is in the works for Facebook? I would be a BIG fan of this feature. My social graph is much more trusted on Facebook. This is because I’m a huge proponent of keeping your Facebook social graph “clean”.

My point is; Twitter might be doing a great service to Facebook- which is socializing the real-time status update concept to the masses — and ultimately Facebook can add-in feature sets reminiscent (if not identical) to Twitter when they want to. The question is, how long should they wait to add it in? Or should they even do it?

  • @peter_may;

    * I don't disagree that Twitter and Facebook are different. In fact, I point out that Facebook can become a strong competitor NOT replacement.

    * You point out that following someone on Twitter is more relaxed than friending someone on Facebook. One could argue all those people who are trying out twitter and quiting because the stream of thoughts and posts aren't relevant to them -- Facebook wouldn't face the same degree of this problem. One of the many reasons why I think it would be powerful for Facebook to move forward with this.

    * Facebook and Twitter should and can coexist, I'm not saying that it's one or the other.

    However, the difference is -- Facebook could bake-in Twitter's features into FB, thus making it an even more powerful social tool.
  • Well, I have to disagree.

    Twitter and Facebook are fundamentally different. Accepting someone as a friend on Facebook is a fairly big deal. Following someone on Twitter isn't. Most people follow far more accounts on Twitter than they have friends on Facebook for that reason. There's more to do on Facebook - it's a heavyweight social app. Twitter is really just a stream of thoughts/posts.

    Also, the default for Twitter is for everybody to see everybody else's posts (if they want to). That functionality does not even exist in Facebook (for a good reason - it's different, more intimate).

    Twitter and Facebook fill different roles. If Facebook was to change to become Twitter, someone else would come and fill the space left by Facebook.

    That's not to say that a stream of status updates from Facebook won't be popular - I believe it will be - but it won't be Twitter.

    Cheers,
    @peter_may
  • 1.) The new feature released is that you can receive mobile updates from Facebook pages (aka Fan pages). So anytime someone who owns a Fan page updates their status, you can receive at text alert.

    2.) Yes, you are right that you can receive mobile updates already -- right now, users are required to complete the complex task of editing your ‘mobile app’ settings. It's someone complicated and most people don't do it.

    ...however, if Facebook allowed you to indicate whom you receive mobile updates when you ADD a friend OR with a simple click like the 'like' or 'comment' button -- that would completely change things.
  • Erik
    so I caught a similar story last night:

    http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/04/facebook-text-updates/

    I'm confused though...I think this feature is already available through Facebook's Mobile app (you can select any number of friends you would like to be notified of status updates when they happen through the Facebook Mobile app).

    I'm curious though...Is the use case of being notified EVERY time someone updates their status really all that valuable when you have 400 some people you're following? Add to that a whole bunch of public profiles and it seems like a lot of noise.

    I currently use the Facebook for BlackBerry app (and dabble with UberTwitter) and like that I can go check the feed of status (stati??) on Facebook or Twitter on demand and I'm only notified when things happen directly to me (personal/direct message, @reply, wall comment, photo comment, etc...)
blog comments powered by Disqus

(c) 2010 www.ramseymohsen.com – Ramsey Mohsen; web consultant, DJ, video blogger, lifecaster, Kansas City blogger & internet addict.