No one reads all your Tweets. Get over yourself.

marketing and business,tech news & insight — Tags: , — ramseymohsen @ Monday, July 19th, 2010 - 12:32 pm

A client recently told me they were concerned they didn’t want to “clutter” their Tweet stream. They were concerned they didn’t want to Tweet too much.

My thoughts? No one reads all your Tweets.

Twitter is a communication tool.
…not a publishing platform.

Twitter is for holding conversations.
…and to have real dialogue and interactions without physical time and space constraints.

In the early years of Twitter (2006-’08), people actually read ALL the Tweets from the people they followed. Twitter was new, fun and only the geeky early adopters were experimenting with it. Today, the average person follows 100+ or 1000+ of people. To physically read and consume the Tweets from that many people is impossible. And more importantly, it doesn’t happen.

Twitter is like gigantic gushing stream or river of many things…
It’s filled with link referrals, pictures, thoughts, opinions, and conversations (look at this- click this- read this- watch this video-). This tool has evolved to this incredibly fast moving “river” of content. People do not consume all of it. Instead, it’s people jump-in-and-out of “the river”.

If no one reads all your Tweets, what should you do?
The more you communicate and appear within Twitter river of content, the better. On a day-to-day basis, people log-in and log-out of Twitter using multiple types of tools and at different times. People will open Twitter when they’re at work, check the latest Tweets, then their @replies, and log-out. Some people will turn their phone on, launch an application, read their Tweets and @replies and then log-out.

My point is, Twitter is flooded with content, what people see come through on their stream is dependent upon the time of day. Your followers will not see everything you post. The more you Tweet, your chance of being “noticed” in the huge river of Tweets increases.

@replies are the “email” of Twitter
Recently, I blogged about a study that found the first thing people do when they sit down at a computer is check their email. In the same respect, the 1 thing everyone checks when they login to Twitter is their @replies. People do want to know if anyone is talking to them. If you or your company had unlimited time and resources, I would tell you to Tweet as many relevant @reply interactions or DMs with as many people as you possibly could. As a general rule of thumb, when you login to Twitter, spend as much time as you can to @reply and interact. Twitter is worthless if you aren’t able to augment existing relationships or create real interactions with people of like interests. While you can use Twitter as another publishing platform, its biggest value is having real interactions through @replies with real people.

Time of day DOES matter.
The chances of anyone consuming your Tweets after 5PM on a weekday or over the weekend are less likely to happen than if you send a Tweet between 9AM to 5PM on a weekday. In my client work experience with Twitter and my own personal usage, there are more interactions and greater chance for consumption that occur Monday through Friday, 9 to 5. As a general rule of thumb, if your Tweet isn’t dependent upon time, or in response to a specific Tweet- you should tweet between 9AM to 5PM on a weekday. If you’re too busy to Tweet 9AM to 5PM, use a tool like Hootsuite that allows you to schedule your Tweets.

Twitter sucks if your friends suck.
Twitter is only as valuable as the people you choose to follow. If the people you follow provide value, then Twitter is a valuable resource you’ll keep using. You’ll keep coming back to it for more. Tweets also need to be timely, relevant, and/or provide some kind of value.

The next time you’re sitting in front of the open-ended prompt that reads, “What’s happening?” you should dismiss the notion that everyone is actually reading everything you’re Tweeting. They’re not.




Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I find twitter to be a great networking tool unfortunately only a selected few know how to use it to properly network with people they don't know. I find the list to be a great way to leverage whose tweets you read verse all the followers you may have. I constantly read the list I created and weed them out from time to time so I stay truly connected to valuable followers. I also read a few of the great list I'm on as well since they are valuable resources to tweeter of like minds too. Either way people sort thru twitter differently and get different things from it in the end. to learn other strategies is helpful until you find your own path.

Of course no one is reading all your tweets. We all dip into the stream from time to time. But, that doesn't mean you shouldn't be concerned about tweeting too much.
No one's tweets are all relevant to any user - but if you tweet 50-100x per day, your irrelevant noise becomes a bigger part of my stream and I will unfollow you.
The more you tweet, the more focused you have to be. If it's random and constant, you'll lose followers.

Speaking as a irrelevant noise spewing random tweeter, I challenge your theory regarding losing followers. As does Klout, as does virtually all gathered statistical data on twitter.

So, so true about the follow list dictating quality of S:N!

I don't think anyone is supposed to read everyone's tweets. Twitter is live. Sometimes I am there... sometimes I am not. That's what makes this all so cool: your Twitter is not my Twitter and you can be rocking the tweets, but if that's not when your connections are around, you're down to that whole, "if a tree falls in the forest" bit.

I take some issue with the slight cop-out at the end regarding scheduling tweets, particularly with your earlier emphasis on "conversations" and "communication vs. publishing". If you combine scheduling with the notion that volume of tweets is a good thing you have the potential for disaster.

Excluding that however, a good piece.

Favorite part of this post: Twitter is a communication tool.
…not a publishing platform.

Amen, Ramsey!!!

I agree with everything but the weekday 9-5 thing. I think a lot of conversations are happening in the evening. The river is less and it's easier to converse. Perhaps that makes your tweets in the evening even more noticeable?

Jill, the context of conversation changes in my opinion. Many people switch to their "personal self" and talk about things like dinner, TV, their kids, etc. While you're right there is a chance your Tweets in the evening are more noticeable, I think there are less users/people checking Twitter during the evening hours. Generally speaking, most people check Twitter at work. Less people check Twitter in the evening at home.

"The more you Tweet, your chance of being “noticed” in the huge river of Tweets increases."

While I agree with the principle, I find myself going to the individual pages of the people I respect who create a lot of great content (there are about 5-6 people like that). Even if they don't tweet the most, I've noticed how insightful they are and I go out of my way to seek out what they're saying. There are people I follow with a ton of followers that tweet 30+ times a day about complete nonsense and I find myself wishing Twitter had a hide button similar to Facebooks so I can block out what they are saying.

Laura, you're a Twitter 'power user' in my opinion (and a great one at that!). The majority of people do not take the time to consume any 1 single person's Tweets. Respectfully, I think your practice and behavior of going to individual pages is an exception and not the majority.

BTW, congrats on MMG. I'm sure you're up to great things!

You are probably right about that.

Thanks Ramsey! :)

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ramsey Mohsen, Betsy McK. Betsy McK said: Well said! Great for newbies RT @ramseym Published a new blog post, "No one reads all your Tweets. Get over yourself." http://bit.ly/9S9xKJ [...]

  2. [...] A recent study of 1.2 billion Tweets found that only 29% of Tweets actually produce a reaction (RT or @replies). The company that conducted the study, Sysomos, also found that almost all (RT) retweets happen within the first hour after the original Tweet. So, if you are looking to get retweeted …your window of opportunity lasts about 1 hour. What does this mean? No one reads all your tweets. Get over yourself. [...]

  3. [...] of how it all works, I’ve blogged about how I believe that no one reads all your Tweets. So get over yourself. Dismiss the notion that everyone is actually reading everything you’re Tweeting. They’re [...]

  4. [...] go ahead, Tweet your brains out. No one reads all your Tweets anyways. Tell people what you had for breakfast. You’ll be perceived as more credible for doing it [...]

  5. [...] I’ve decided I’m going to re-post my most helpful Tweets when I can. I realize you do not read all my Tweets (I’ll get over it). But if you’re subscribed here at my blog, hopefully you’ll [...]

  6. [...] and updates you post in this channel are very disposable. And I’m a firm believer that no one reads all your tweets. (so get over yourself).   But it also means it’s one of the best channels for sentiment regarding live events and [...]


(c) 2012 Ramsey Mohsen