Facebook Places, 7 days later: It’s not better than foursquare

marketing and business,tech news & insight — ramseymohsen @ Tuesday, August 24th, 2010 - 12:38 am

You can’t compare the two services.
They’re different.

7 days after the launch of Facebook Places, I do not think it will replace foursquare. Not yet. A quick scan of my Newsfeed tells me, the majority of my own friends aren’t rushing to check-in and share their location everywhere they go.

As a web consultant, naturally, I wanted to just observe first- use it myself, then form my own opinion(s). Personally, my own circle of friends are still turning to foursquare for real-time location updates even after the launch of Facebook Places (it’s too soon to form conclusions). Here are my initial observations:

  • Because users do not have an expectation that Facebook is a source for real-time social networking, FB Places isn’t being used the same as foursquare, therefore not replacing it. Not yet. FB will have to redesign it’s mobile application interface and website to make it easier to find location information if they want more people to use Places.

  • Foursquare is inherently a real-time platform. Think about it: users have the expectation when they open the app, the information they’re seeing about their friends is real-time. Foursquare highlights data about your friends over minutes and a few hours. That’s a big difference in utility and usage when compared to Facebook. “Top News” on FB can be delayed by over 20+HRS in showing you updates.

The fact is, location-based social networking is still foreign concept to most. 84% have not even heard of foursquare, Gowalla or Brightkite. And FB Places is only on the iPhone and Touch devices. This means, this 500 million other people on Facebook, like my mom, aren’t going understand how to use this feature right away. It’s going to take time.


The initial launch of Facebook Places could have been annouced as BETA, because the features set is lean. But that’s the point. They have made it simple and easy for everyone to first understand. While most people might not initially use it, they’re introducing the concept. Let people get comfortable and socialized with it. Then, over time, I believe they’ll draw perpetual attention as they release new features and enhancements. Make no doubt there’s big plans for how to draw more people into finding value with using FB Places. It will be fun to see how things shake out.

Until then, I’ll be the first to admit, I’m a bit annoyed having to check-in two places now :) What do you think? Are you using it? What are your thoughts? Share them, good and bad.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The biggest difference to date, is that you can in fact Check-in on FB Places! FourSquare has had miserable up-time issues the past two days. Right at a point when SCVNGR, Gowalla, Booyah among others are trying to gain market share. It sounds as though these technical "shards" issues will persist as they must be experiencing exponential growth.

I surprised Scoble wasn't a complete douche to you as he was to me. He blocked me and everything. But I digress.

Good post.

Thanks Danny. Sorry to hear you had a negative interaction with Robert.

I agree, I was annoyed with checking in at two places and went back to checking in on Foursquare since I can have it update my facebook location message anyway. Plus, I admit, I like competing against others to check in more and earn the badges on Foursquare.

I actually think the facebook places sucks in it's ease of checking in. I couldn't find it at first. I think it should be where the photo icon is by the status update. When I'm on my mobile and on the News Feed I didn't think to go back out to the navigation home screen to click on Places to then check in.

I'm back to Foursquare for now. It allows me to update places for those friends who care to know where I am all the time and only update to Twitter and fb when it's a place significant enough to share with others and write a status with it.

Agreed! The UX on the mobile app has to be redesigned if they want it to be easy and top-of-mind for people to check-in.

Ramsey - have you seen any businesses which have merged their Place page with their business page yet? I'm curious to see what that looks like. And whether a business with multiple locations can merge multiple Place pages to one business page.

I would've expected it to be smoother around the edges before they rolled it out. As Corey alluded to, the fact that it's not available on Blackberry, Palm Pre, etc. is a big hurdle to acceptance.

Not to mention that 84% stat.

I agree, it's less robust than foursquare. While they're just getting started, the users who are familiar with foursquare are comparing their experience, and likely left unfulfilled with the feature set. There are over 100+ Android phones, so an app on that platform is a must if they want adoption.

Not a fan... Facebook should really concentrate on cleaning up their current practices (businesses still running pages as "people", underage kids allowed to create profiles without parent intervention, rampant spam profiles) before trying to take on and drive out innovators in the marketplace.

Haha, Scoble!

Facebook places doesn't even work on my Palm Pre yet... At first the notification for the app popped up but there wasn't a tab. Yesterday, the Places tab loaded but it was only able to show me friend check-ins. I wasn't able to check in myself.

Actually, the most intriguing recent conversation I've heard about location was from Scoble interviewing the Whrrl execs. http://www.cinchcast.com/scobleizer/86262


(c) 2012 Ramsey Mohsen